 Ukrainian Drone Factory (VoxelMatters) It always starts with a printer, kindaWhen talking about the drone renaissance, we need to talk about 3D printing among other things. I compare 3D printers to the Gutenberg printing press in importance. Just as Johannes Gutenberg's invention in the 15th century democratized knowledge by making books less costly to produce by hand, and made them more widespread, 3D Printing and additive manufacturing is revolutionizing how we create physical objects (aside from 3D slop, like Baby Yoda and The Rock, but I digress) especially in fields like aerospace and security. The Gutenberg press transformed society by lowering the barriers to information dissemination and access. Similarly, 3D printers and the internet are lowering the barriers to designing and manufacturing complex components, enabling anyone with a desktop setup to produce parts that were once the domain of industrial facilities. Over the past decade and a half, 3D Printing has seen explosive growth in capabilities while prices have plummeted, making it a key enabler in the drone renaissance. Cost Over-time: Industrial/Research/Commercial  Cost Over-time: Consumer / Prosumer  Methodology: How I Determined These Numbers First off, sourcing solid data in a niche like 3D printing isn't as simple as Googling "printer prices." The industry is full of proprietary reports, and conflicting information, especially from a decade or more ago. However, this is one of those situations where AI searching and verification information comes in handy.
Core information comes from the Wohlers Report series (Wohlers Associates, ASTM International), the go-to for additive manufacturing market information. Their 2023 edition draws from surveys of 119 service providers, 128 manufacturers, 27 material producers, and 92 global co-authors- so I'll trust them. Supplemented by AM Research, Protolabs Trends, and sites like 3D Printing Industry and All3DP. Data spans 1980s patents to 2025 forecasts, gathered via targeted searches for public summaries. These are all secondary sources, not original surveys. Costs: Segmenting Over Time Average printer prices bucketed: industrial (> $5,000), consumer (< $1,000), prosumer ($1,000–$5,000). Compiled from reviews, crowdfunds, and analyses, e.g., '80s SLA at ~$300K to modern $200 kits. Averages: Weighted low/mid/high per 5-year block, adjusted for drops (80% from 2008–2023 via patents/competition). Pre-2006: Industrial only. Sources: Wohlers for industrial; retail for others. Limits: Excludes materials/ops; sparse early data. Units Sold: Shipment Snapshots Total shipments with breakdowns (industrial, consumer, metal). Wohlers direct: 278,000 consumer (2015), 591,079 (2018), 3,793 metal (2023). Gaps extrapolated from growth rates (e.g., 171.4% industrial 2009–2013). Projections via Compound Annual Growth Rates (CAGR) Limits: Aggregated data; thin early breakdowns and paywalled reports I'm not paying for. Superiority Adjustment: Making Comparisons Fair Inflation adjustments show how money's purchasing power changes due to rising prices. In my 3D printing cost comparisons (e.g., 2015 printers vs. the 2025 Bambu Lab P1S), I used them to convert past prices into today's dollars for fair comparisons. This relies on the U.S. Consumer Price Index (CPI), tracking average urban consumer price changes. Raw: 2015 prosumer (e.g., Airwolf AXIOM ~$4,500) vs. 2025 P1S $869 ~5x cheaper nominally. Inflation (40% cumulative): ~$6,300 in 2025 dollars, so ~7x in real savings. However, 2015 tech lagged: Slower (100–150 mm/s vs. 500), involved more manual setup, and rare but clunky multi-material capabilities. Industry reports show 2–5x productivity gains since via speed/efficiency/AI. Conservative 2.5x factor: Effective 2015 cost ~$11,250 (~$15,750 inflated). P1S: ~5.5% of that or ~18x cheaper, once adjusted. This is an estimate from benchmarks, but we've seen 3–5x increase in speed, and 50–80% reductions in material, time, and energy inefficiencies, based on industry benchmarks.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |